Did Time Start at the Big Bang?

24 722
741
 
Comments
robert harvey
robert harvey - 7 hours ago
Those that say there cannot be time before the singularity do not conceive how a black hole is created. If a black hole is a singularity, then we know there was time before the singularity as in the collapse of a star to create the black hole and a singularity. To try to say there was no time before the Big Bang is a misnomer.
David Lucas
David Lucas - Day ago
this one video answered many questions.
Stefano Portoghesi
Stefano Portoghesi - Day ago
How do we know that the Universe began 13.8 billions years ago ? Surely that measurement of earthly "Time" may be valid for our human sphere of reality only but what about universal "Time" , one individual's past event in "time" may be another individual' future event in "time" .
Alex Bordon
Alex Bordon - 2 days ago
I have a new gravity, time and consciousness theory that connects quantum mechanics, black holes, dark energy and gravity with existence and a universal balance, what should I do?
Alex Bordon
Alex Bordon - 2 days ago
Any tips?
420drwilldo
420drwilldo - 2 days ago
If your really think about it what is time but the observation of the Decay rate of the universe so of theyer is nothing to decay then there is nothing to observe decaying
Daniel Baenziger
Daniel Baenziger - 3 days ago
I think Carl would have really enjoyed these videos.

Many thanks to Matt and his team for taking part of his mantle. Cheers.
Spiritual Braces
Spiritual Braces - 3 days ago
i always wondered if our universe was just some black hole in another universe...
Chris Howe
Chris Howe - 3 days ago
Was there a video that tackled the idea of Tachyons during expansion?
My best guess. No.
The density of the universe at the Singularity would create a difference in 'c' similar to what we see around a black hole. However, relativity brings us to a screeching halt there since it's from our perspective that 'c' is changing at all.
Would this all come together to indicate that a sationary observer during expansion would in-fact have witnessed tachyon-level information transmission? Wouldn't this also mean that 'c' is relative to the observer and thus tachyons would be possible only from a certain perspective?
Example: 2 starships travel conventionally at 0.75c towards eachother. The observer on starship a would witness starship b approaching at >c. viola! Tachyons??? This would also mean a new c is in order where 2c is "true" constant???
Elias
Elias - 3 days ago
watching this sort of stuff feels a bit like getting my brain spanked
Lelouch Yagami
Lelouch Yagami - 3 days ago
We can say 1 day before big bang...
Steve Openshaw
Steve Openshaw - 3 days ago
I am an atheist, but listening to how convoluted all these different creation theories are, it makes me think that it may well just be simpler to buy that some old dude with a beard did it.
Dave Anand
Dave Anand - 3 days ago
We only speak of one directional time in the positive direction - What about NEGATIVE Time Axis ???
Back to Seattle
Back to Seattle - 3 days ago
Entropy wouldn't be to happy about it
robert charlton
robert charlton - 4 days ago
time and space are very complicated, take for example, that we can travel at the speed of light and there are twins, that are astronaughts, 1 of them stays on earth and the other goes on a trip to jupiter at the speed of light, when he comes back, the twin that stayed on earth would be older than the twin that went to jupiter.
Simon Coles
Simon Coles - 4 days ago
I'm a bit fan of the Penrose CCC theory
Amzar Nacht
Amzar Nacht - 4 days ago
*heh* Time pre-dated the 'big bang' - but there was no way to measure it as the required atomic vibrations were at a standstill. Nothing got within a thousand light years without being sucked in...
Once the trigger initiated, time could then be measured by the vibration of energetic particles that formed soon after.
Time as *WE* know it - you know, these bone-encased gray blobs of neurons that have existed for about one billionth of a second on the 'year clock' of the life of the universe (as in, one billionth of a second from midnight, december 31st on that calendar) - is something only *WE* conceived and chose to call 'time', so what time was prior to the creation of our small corner of the greater macroverse well... it had already been defined by others. Perhaps others advanced enough to even manipulate or travel along it *then*
chrisgotagun time
chrisgotagun time - 4 days ago
God is the big bang theory
Faris
Faris - 4 days ago
Is anyone else triggered about the way he wears his shirt?
Prestia2011
Prestia2011 - Day ago
Why cause it's lower on one shoulder? Maybe he's got uneven upper body
Viker
Viker - 5 days ago
Im watching this video trying to expand my knowledge and get smarter and cause i like space but god why am i so stupid that i dont understand almost a single thing
james caley
james caley - 5 days ago
Never trust anything with a singularity.
M Johnson
M Johnson - 5 days ago
It seems like the Universe once expanded to a point of thermal equilibrium is the same as the universe before the big band at thermal equilibrium. What about a Bose–Einstein condensate could it be state of matter at the point before the big bang at the end of that expansion?
56pjr
56pjr - 5 days ago
"In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth" (Genesis 1:1).
Tymen Timmer
Tymen Timmer - 6 days ago
One thing that bothers me is the whole t=0 or t=something for that matter. How do you know what time we live in? And what happens from t=-1?
Games Creator
Games Creator - 6 days ago
Thanks for exploding my brain...
Deipatrous
Deipatrous - 6 days ago
Your maths is shaky. Which is a pity because this channel is better than most.
djchristian82
djchristian82 - 5 days ago
Yea show your mathematical skills.
Traian
Traian - 6 days ago
So, with a Planck time as the smallest unit of time and a Planck length as the smallest unit of distance, why is it mathematically such a problem? instead of infinitely divisible 0.something why not make 1 the smallest number possible (1 as in the singularity) and abolish fractions. (one is the smallest number, the next smallest is 2 ...) shouldn't the math solve itself after that? you get as far as you can get as long as you have space time, and before that it doesn't matter because without space time you can't define it. In fact if you want to go back the universe's beginning 2 is the farthest you can go because that's the actual first second and the first measurable size between 2 points (you need 2 at least points to measure a distance or an interval of time. P.S. -for you physicists out there: how is gravity warping space-time ? is the Planck unit of distance changing or what?
Stan TheObserver
Stan TheObserver - 6 days ago
If the Universe was all at one point...then how could it be infinite? Also,dark energy was not all it was at the big bang as it grows as it still perculates out of nothing. Something's missing.
Stan TheObserver
Stan TheObserver - 4 days ago
@djchristian82 They are certain that by any other name a force is expanding the universe. It's everything after that they can't say for certain. Dark Matter on the other hand might just be regular matter,just in microscopic bits and invisible clouds of it. Or not.
djchristian82
djchristian82 - 5 days ago
Dark energy is nothing proven just a hypothesis.
Lord Pyrex
Lord Pyrex - 6 days ago
Black holes consume all matter over time and eventually each other and eventually only one exists and eventually even that is taken back to a single point which then erupts back out into a new big bang.
Luigi Cantoviani
Luigi Cantoviani - 6 days ago
Inflation is not a matter fact event.
Roboprogs
Roboprogs - 5 days ago
Yeah inflation theory makes me cringe, too. Any observations of an inflation, or a falsifiable test? My theory is that the universe started are as something about the size of a lumpy beach ball 🤡 (But I don’t know how to test it, so it’s probably crap even more so) As Opus the Penguin said “Well, why not?!?”
Theo0x89
Theo0x89 - 7 days ago
6:34 _"we trace a path called a geodesic, which in general relativity is the shortest path between two space-time coordinates"_ More like the "straightest" path between two points in space-time. Typically it is the longest path, measured in proper time, which is the measure of length in space time. Also, "between two space-time coordinates" is an awkward formulation. There is no need to refer to coordinates, and the two endpoints of the path would correspond to two sets of four coordinates with respect to some coordinate system.
neil u
neil u - 7 days ago
ok, but what size would a black hole be thats the mass of the universe? how could the big bang have started smaller than that? does information theory put a minimum size for the whole universes information to be stored on the surface a universe mass black hole? thanks
Enki Son Of Anu
Enki Son Of Anu - 7 days ago
Not weird enough
Hecka Nice
Hecka Nice - 7 days ago
No. Time starts with a point of consciousness
Ive_y 79
Ive_y 79 - 8 days ago
I watche this then I died
Apollo Stone
Apollo Stone - 8 days ago
No one really knows how the universe started but mainly theories are the only thing to talk about. Again, we know nothing, yet we always explore somwthing.
Jari Haukilahti
Jari Haukilahti - 9 days ago
Maybe time started big bang.
memo redspectrum
memo redspectrum - 9 days ago
planc length has some idea
Akshay Kalghatgi
Akshay Kalghatgi - 9 days ago
Has anyone ever considered the possibility that the Big Bang might have been a White Hole.
Vincent Smith
Vincent Smith - 7 days ago
He kind of said that that was a possibility in different words
Dominic A
Dominic A - 10 days ago
It’s magic !,no other explanation.
ZERO3690
ZERO3690 - 10 days ago
I see.. Big Bang is not a theory any more, it is a fact and so we are now focused on other things to solve
quidam
quidam - 10 days ago
Hey, great thanks from France !!! I was wondering if you'd talk about the BGV theorem some day as it seems to have a connection with beginnings ? I've heard about it but can't grasp the implications and on what assumptions it rests... Anyways, big big fan of yours !!!
Andrew Pope
Andrew Pope - 10 days ago
I greatly appreciate this honest attempt at explaining this stuff however I am absolutely none-the-wiser
Underscore Pete
Underscore Pete - 10 days ago
Is it possible that 3 of our universal forces already existed at the proposed time of the big bang and gravity then occurred for the first time in our universe? Can a universe exist without gravity?
Ajit Jha
Ajit Jha - 11 days ago
I am inclined towards Holographic Universe. The space itself is a projection, where as the so called reality is somewhere else.
PistolPunch
PistolPunch - 11 days ago
What if black holes singularity after vapourizing somehow creates an explosion which causes space to expand and creates new materials. Like dividing by 0. It would create and endlesss cycle of new universes everywhere.
Martin L
Martin L - 11 days ago
Odd place to put this. I'm an evolutionary biologist, so am prone to be a Smolin fan boy. But this is something different, that all PBS channels have in common. I'm British and am totally sick to the teeth by the very American obsession with religion vs science. You don't really get it in the UK. To be honest, I am just SO cheesed off that everytime I look at something interesting, videos, below the video I'm watching, nearly always carry at least some videos by people who are either crazy, or have no idea what a theory means, and why science must always be agnostic, about everything. Sorry to have a rant. I'm just fed up with this unending war between OCD anti religion, and plain stupid anti science. Drives me nuts. So hooray for PBS, Crash Course etc. I am seriously in love with PBS. If you carry on, you might even get as good as the BBC. HA!
Systematic Error
Systematic Error - 11 days ago
ALLAH is the GREATEST.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyCezBD-5EQ
Deborah Mahon
Deborah Mahon - 11 days ago
Our God is an awesome God.
The Werewolf
The Werewolf - 11 days ago
Sure. but what about Galactus?
Kyle Buchanan
Kyle Buchanan - 11 days ago
you have explained exactly nothing, cmon start making some meaningful videos please guys
penguins forall
penguins forall - 11 days ago
Big bANG rewind 0000
WolfgangLMclain
WolfgangLMclain - 12 days ago
Something just occured to me, the weight of the universe at its earliest point must have been ENORMOUS, what did that mean for the spacetime curve of the universe?
LouSaydus
LouSaydus - 10 days ago
You should ask your mother, her rear is of similar density/mass.
WolfgangLMclain
WolfgangLMclain - 12 days ago
*notices*
*reaches into video to tug your shirt into place*
Kirk-Da Rooster Gordon
Kirk-Da Rooster Gordon - 12 days ago
Science tells us you can't create something from nothing okay so what created the singularity that started the big bang?
Romel Abou-Akl
Romel Abou-Akl - 12 days ago
Our laws of science break down at a certain time interval after the big bang, commonly associated with the plank length. I do not have an answer for you, and nobody can answer it because nobody has a good answer to that. Some people have formulated mathematical explanations of how it could have came from "nothing", but there definition of "nothing" can be considered to actual contain something. Also if time does not exist before the Big Bang occurred it actually does not make much sense to ask what happened before it, or what created it since that is a human wording of events that are in a sense timeless. It is hard for us to think of something as timeless. Of course if it stems from another multiverse/bubble universe, etc you can still trace it back to the initial moment in that time frame. Some propose a creator, as there are some logical arguments such as the Leibniz's cosmological argument and many others that attempt to show why there must be one. This is a field of fascinating advancements, logic, physics, mathematics and in some senses even spirituality as we seek where the atoms that make up our consciousness and everything around us stem from. Good luck on your journey for knowledge.
Ulfat Dawood
Ulfat Dawood - 12 days ago
Doesn't the Big Bang Theory violate the "Law of Conservation of Mass" ??
Theo0x89
Theo0x89 - 7 days ago
Conservation of mass hasn't been at thing since Einstein discovered that mass is a form of energy. What you mean is conservation of energy, for which you would need a general definition of energy, which doesn't seem to exist in general relativity. But that's beside the point of your question, I guess, because you seem to think that the energy content of the universe somehow changed at the Big Bang. The Big Bang Theory doesn't say anything like that. It only says that the energy density used to be very high at some point in the past from which the universe went on to expand.
Brian Cananzey
Brian Cananzey - 12 days ago
what if the universe does have a cyclical big bounce and each time it bounces it grows bigger than the last bounce. eventually if exceeds its ability to crunch any longer and after its last bounce it expands forever. We are in that expansion? Hmmm? Like a ball bouncing every time going higher and higher till it leaves the surface of the earth? ....excuse my while I hit this joint again!
Harry H
Harry H - 12 days ago
Alien in another universe made our universe, their universe was in turn made the same way, ad inf, different universe different laws
A Tothetop
A Tothetop - 13 days ago
Every Christian who appeals to the Big Bang theory from a causality perspective needs to see this!
Subodh Khandekar
Subodh Khandekar - 13 days ago
At 5:22 ...
It's not 3 dimensional...
It's 4 dimensional space !!!
Lucid D
Lucid D - 13 days ago
The big bang is like the mitochondrial eve in genetic, just a logical response from a bad question or attitude. Same with the chicken or the egg? question. They are just bias rooted in our social understanding and psychology. There is no mitochondrial eve that ever existed and both the egg and the chicken are phases in evolution, both cell forms and bodies evolved together to produce one or the other.
tenaciousvalor
tenaciousvalor - 13 days ago
BLACK HOLES CREATE BIG BANGS.
Timothy Bucci
Timothy Bucci - 13 days ago
Patterns in the universe repeat themselves. The universe probably will too. If all of matter had a specific origin, and the amount of mass in the universe has a limit, even if myriad... eventually acceleration will shift back to deceleration and combine back into a single singularity black hole once again. Maybe after .54 googol years, is my guess
Timothy Bucci
Timothy Bucci - 11 days ago
@Adrian Constantin But they have only been observing this ancient universe for what, 100 years? With pristine telescopes and such? They may be misperceiving things.
Timothy Bucci
Timothy Bucci - 11 days ago
@Adrian Constantin Or acceleration is bullshit. The Millennium Simulation shows what has been theoretically observed, and there are flows or currents of galaxies headed toward specific gravitational wells.
Adrian Constantin
Adrian Constantin - 11 days ago
One way this doesnt work is if acceleration / inflation never stops ... than gravity does not win
Dima Chotin
Dima Chotin - 14 days ago
Did he just say Steinhardt-Turok model?
Like in... a hard as stone dinosaur hunting american native?
Sarath Ambalapatt
Sarath Ambalapatt - 14 days ago
Imo Past and future exists because we have memories and thoughts
There is only just PRESENT
and its always CHANGING!
David Heizer
David Heizer - 10 days ago
This is why I think it's silly wondering why we can't see all of the 11 dimensions predicted by string theory: we already know we live in at least a 4-dimensional universe, but only three of those dimensions are physical. We really cannot directly perceive the time dimension; we experience it only through the contrast between what exists at the moment and what our memories tell us used to exist.
P Sigh Ko
P Sigh Ko - 14 days ago
It seems most scientists reject this presentist view (and favor the eternalist block universe). You're a minority, my friend.
jojolafrite90
jojolafrite90 - 14 days ago
I"ts tricky to talk about, to talk about the size of an infinite universe.
That was a shitty rime.
froop
froop - 14 days ago
the real question is: is time a conserved property?
MoscowBaseStation
MoscowBaseStation - 14 days ago
Please help me. I feel in order for the big bang to happen there must be a space within the big bang to take place ..
Aarond Anton
Aarond Anton - 15 days ago
The science of the Big Bang as told by science is flawed in that the heat and forces involved would kill off any living organism effectively sterilizing everything in the Universe. Good news is that God created everything from a single point of origin and in that moment time started God the Father and Creator in Heaven is infinite and eternal.
Aarond Anton
Aarond Anton - 14 days ago
@P Sigh Ko yup trolling for fishers of men
P Sigh Ko
P Sigh Ko - 14 days ago
Lol. xD Troll.
JT
JT - 15 days ago
Finally someone who actually knows what they're talking about
Kyle Buchanan
Kyle Buchanan - 11 days ago
hes not got a clue r u mad
SaStrixS
SaStrixS - 15 days ago
An even better question would be "What time did the big bang start?"
Rosolino Lo Sciuto
Rosolino Lo Sciuto - 15 days ago
Il N.W.O. ha un programma specifico e' determinato con l'Unione delle Nazioni Repubblicane impartito dalla coscienza universale
Osvaldo Lopez
Osvaldo Lopez - 16 days ago
For those using cc, at 10:50 it says "brains" but it should say "branes"
Forbes Media
Forbes Media - 16 days ago
this guy needs a stylist or someone to tell him to wear his shirt properly -_- it is distracting
Thomas Gassett
Thomas Gassett - 16 days ago
When you wind the clocks back to just before the big bang you don't end up with a singularity ... you end up with nothing. Before the universe there was ... nothing.
P Sigh Ko
P Sigh Ko - 14 days ago
@Tom Coates Um. It seems to me you don't understand cosmology. If you don't understand something, then shut up and don't prentend you have debunked it. It is embarassing.
Tom Coates
Tom Coates - 16 days ago
Good one TG. Space and time could not have begun at the BB because there was nowhere for the universe to come into and no point at which it could start. So no BB. Solid matter and energy does exist. The question still stands. Where did it all come from? If I was offered a complete hot meal. Then I was told there was no chef, and that the meal just happened by itself, I would think that someone might be a touch mad. A creation demands a ..................
Delfino Garza
Delfino Garza - 16 days ago
Time started at the big bang if the big bang started counting time then. This channel is full of magic, it's not scientific. This guy is a wizard...ignore him or he will drag you into a quest where you will risk your life and gain something trivial.
exitolaboral
exitolaboral - 16 days ago
I don't understand why there is an "universal time" for the whole universe and a timeline for the universe is presented, when GR implies that "there is no universal clock". The discussion seems pointless, is there an "universal time" or there is not?
P Sigh Ko
P Sigh Ko - 14 days ago
​@Lünkel GR and inflationary theories predict it. However, if you take QM into account, it seems there is no geodesics incompleteness. At least on the Cosmology from quantum potential it does not. Furthermore it doesn't apply to the comoving geodesics themselves.
exitolaboral
exitolaboral - 15 days ago
@Lünkel thanks!
Lünkel
Lünkel - 16 days ago
Didn't he explicitly say that there isn't one single universal time, but that each observer has his own worldline that has to be tracked. It's just that GR predicts that all worldlines converge on a single point and time.
Rob de Vrind
Rob de Vrind - 17 days ago
If you move with the speed of light time stands still. Alan Guth inflation talks about expantion in speeds faster than the speed of light. Didn't that rewind time??
Alex Taunton
Alex Taunton - 15 days ago
No. Time appears to stand still from an inertial observer, not for you.
Aidan Sheridan
Aidan Sheridan - 17 days ago
Have you considered loop theory?
Tom Coates
Tom Coates - 17 days ago
Yet another theory. Next!
Space/time is a nothing. Its a fantasy. One can't mix differing items as one.
Its like ...three metres of orange flavoured sympathy.
....'can't see the wood for the trees?' No its ......'don't want to see the wood or the trees'.
Drivel.
directtalk1
directtalk1 - 17 days ago
I can’t understand the arm lengths on his t shirt
Wu Li
Wu Li - 17 days ago
Classical physics are so mired in metaphysical mystical mumbo jumbo. Set your mind free people, in a multiverse within a singularity the only thing it remains humanly possible to appreciate is what's missing from this picture. Examining our own mortal fallibility should reveal the supersymmetry of the Standard Theory, while Roger Penrose's theory of quantum induced microwave vibrations in the brain has already received two experimental confirmations. Whether physicists like it or not, Quantum Cognition is a recognized field and we are going down the rabbit hole or toilet of your personal preference. Assuming 42 is as good an answer as anyone is ever going to get, that should make sparkling laughter, the infectious kind known as Santa Claus laughter, should express the lowest possible energy state of the conscious mind, and prove to be magically more than 100% efficient and conveying energy and information.
Wu Li
Wu Li - 14 days ago
The next scientific revolution is beginning and nobody has a clue what its all leading up to, and condensed matter physics and AI research all appear to be converging with neurology and require four times more complex mathematics than we have, which the computers are about to spit out.
Wu Li
Wu Li - 14 days ago
Penrose's theory is garbage, but he got together with a neurologist and they figured out where quantum mechanics might manifest in the brain. Quanta appear to be whatever you want them to be, often being called "formless" and recent experiments even establishing that time can appear to flow backwards on macroscopic scales, using a micron sized polystyrene bead suspended above a heat bath. We are rapidly going down the rabbit hole, whether you wish to admit it or not, and a DARPA scientist just patented the first room temperature superconductor.
Wu Li
Wu Li - 14 days ago
A reminder, it is still illegal to vote for Mickey Mouse in Maryland, so stop it already. Donald Duck won. Democracy is fulfilling your patriotic duty and voting for whichever clown advertises the most and is not a member of the Mickey Mouse Club.
Wu Li
Wu Li - 14 days ago
You have to consider your source carefully, when dealing with idiots paid to spout 2,000 year old bullshit.
Wu Li
Wu Li - 14 days ago
Academics are all part of the military-industrial complex and, these days, complain about paywalls, while lobbying congress to censor the entire internet, because one in five of the idiots they teach insists the sun revolves around the earth. Forty years of research concluded the republican party organizes like chickens, providing proof that military intelligence and Wall Street ethics are bullshit.
Next videos